PDA

View Full Version : Numbers Generators



Shecoda
02-18-2005, 04:20 PM
MAGIC EIGHT-BALL DEPARTMENT -

Can This Black Box See Into the Future?

Deep in the basement of a dusty university library in Edinburgh lies a small black box, roughly the size of two cigarette packets side by side, that churns out random numbers in an endless stream.

At first glance it is an unremarkable piece of equipment. Encased in metal, it contains at its heart a microchip no more complex than the ones found in modern pocket calculators.

But, according to a growing band of top scientists, this box has quite extraordinary powers. It is, they claim, the ’eye’ of a machine that appears capable of peering into the future and predicting major world events.

The machine apparently sensed the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre four hours before they happened - but in the fevered mood of conspiracy theories of the time, the claims were swiftly knocked back by sceptics. But last December, it also appeared to forewarn of the Asian tsunami just before the deep sea earthquake that precipitated the epic tragedy.

Now, even the doubters are acknowledging that here is a small box with apparently inexplicable powers.

’It’s Earth-shattering stuff,’ says Dr Roger Nelson, emeritus researcher at Princeton University in the United States, who is heading the research project behind the ’black box’ phenomenon.

’We’re very early on in the process of trying to figure out what’s going on here. At the moment we’re stabbing in the dark.’ Dr Nelson’s investigations, called the Global Consciousness Project, were originally hosted by Princeton University and are centred on one of the most extraordinary experiments of all time. Its aim is to detect whether all of humanity shares a single subconscious mind that we can all tap into without realising.

And machines like the Edinburgh black box have thrown up a tantalising possibility: that scientists may have unwittingly discovered a way of predicting the future.

Although many would consider the project’s aims to be little more than fools’ gold, it has still attracted a roster of 75 respected scientists from 41 different nations. Researchers from Princeton - where Einstein spent much of his career - work alongside scientists from universities in Britain, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany. The project is also the most rigorous and longest-running investigation ever into the potential powers of the paranormal.

’Very often paranormal phenomena evaporate if you study them for long enough,’ says physicist Dick Bierman of the University of Amsterdam. ’But this is not happening with the Global Consciousness Project. The effect is real. The only dispute is about what it means.’

The project has its roots in the extraordinary work of Professor Robert Jahn of Princeton University during the late 1970s. He was one of the first modern scientists to take paranormal phenomena seriously. Intrigued by such things as telepathy, telekinesis - the supposed psychic power to move objects without the use of physical force - and extrasensory perception, he was determined to study the phenomena using the most up-to-date technology available.

One of these new technologies was a humble-looking black box known was a Random Event Generator (REG). This used computer technology to generate two numbers - a one and a zero - in a totally random sequence, rather like an electronic coin-flipper.

The pattern of ones and noughts - ’heads’ and ’tails’ as it were - could then be printed out as a graph. The laws of chance dictate that the generators should churn out equal numbers of ones and zeros - which would be represented by a nearly flat line on the graph. Any deviation from this equal number shows up as a gently rising curve.

During the late 1970s, Prof Jahn decided to investigate whether the power of human thought alone could interfere in some way with the machine’s usual readings. He hauled strangers off the street and asked them to concentrate their minds on his number generator. In effect, he was asking them to try to make it flip more heads than tails.

It was a preposterous idea at the time. The results, however, were stunning and have never been satisfactorily explained.

Again and again, entirely ordinary people proved that their minds could influence the machine and produce significant fluctuations on the graph, ’forcing it’ to produce unequal numbers of ’heads’ or ’tails’.

According to all of the known laws of science, this should not have happened - but it did. And it kept on happening.

Dr Nelson, also working at Princeton University, then extended Prof Jahn’s work by taking random number machines to group meditations, which were very popular in America at the time. Again, the results were eyepopping. The groups were collectively able to cause dramatic shifts in the patterns of numbers.

From then on, Dr Nelson was hooked.

Using the internet, he connected up 40 random event generators from all over the world to his laboratory computer in Princeton. These ran constantly, day in day out, generating millions of different pieces of data. Most of the time, the resulting graph on his computer looked more or less like a flat line.

But then on September 6, 1997, something quite extraordinary
happened: the graph shot upwards, recording a sudden and massive shift in the number sequence as his machines around the world started reporting huge deviations from the norm. The day was of historic importance for another reason, too.

For it was the same day that an estimated one billion people around the world watched the funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales at Westminster Abbey.

Dr Nelson was convinced that the two events must be related in some way.

Could he have detected a totally new phenomena? Could the concentrated emotional outpouring of millions of people be able to influence the output of his REGs. If so, how?

Dr Nelson was at a loss to explain it.

So, in 1998, he gathered together scientists from all over the world to analyse his findings. They, too, were stumped and resolved to extend and deepen the work of Prof Jahn and Dr Nelson. The Global Consciousness Project was born.

Since then, the project has expanded massively. A total of 65 Eggs (as the generators have been named) in 41 countries have now been recruited to act as the ’eyes’ of the project.

And the results have been startling and inexplicable in equal measure.

For during the course of the experiment, the Eggs have ’sensed’ a whole series of major world events as they were happening, from the Nato bombing of Yugoslavia to the Kursk submarine tragedy to America’s hung election of 2000.

The Eggs also regularly detect huge global celebrations, such as New Year’s Eve.

But the project threw up its greatest enigma on September 11, 2001.

As the world stood still and watched the horror of the terrorist attacks unfold across New York, something strange was happening to the Eggs.

Not only had they registered the attacks as they actually happened, but the characteristic shift in the pattern of numbers had begun four hours before the two planes even hit the Twin Towers.

They had, it appeared, detected that an event of historic importance was about to take place before the terrorists had even boarded their fateful flights. The implications, not least for the West’s security services who constantly monitor electronic ’chatter’, are clearly enormous.

’I knew then that we had a great deal of work ahead of us,’ says Dr Nelson.

What could be happening? Was it a freak occurrence, perhaps?

Apparently not. For in the closing weeks of December last year, the machines went wild once more.

Twenty-four hours later, an earthquake deep beneath the Indian Ocean triggered the tsunami which devastated South-East Asia, and claimed the lives of an estimated quarter of a million people.

So could the Global Consciousness Project really be forecasting the future?



Source: Daily Mail, RedNova
http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=126649


This is a long article. I decided to paste a shorter version. check out the website for the rest.

Sean
02-18-2005, 05:25 PM
Interesting article. I knew a guy who played around with a random number generator. He noted at times it seemed be be generating not so random numbers. He wasn't using it for any scientific purposes. He was using it to pick lottery numbers.
He thought though that electonic random number generation was not the same as mechanical random number generation. Electronic being the inferior of the two.

Shecoda
02-18-2005, 06:05 PM
Yes, but, did he win?

Sean
02-18-2005, 06:46 PM
Yes, but, did he win?

Nope.

True Wireless
02-18-2005, 10:07 PM
Interesting that the article never mentioned anything about a person's own internal REG. Perhaps, just perhaps, intuition, deja vu and the like that an individual experiences is a human form of REG.

In the individual case I use the example of REG to focus attention, the actual mechanism that is occuring is of course not a part of the mind or body spewing numbers...or is it?

Perhaps it is akin to my awareness in traffic, coming into an intersection I either "feel" confident and drive through it without concern, seamlessly accelerating on after decelerating into the intersection, or I really slow down, as I sense that a potential problem may be in the works. Experience has taught me that a car being driven by a human who is either reckless or somehow not focused (mental faculties) may be entering the intersection although the vehicle is not visible to me when I get that "calling".

Sure enough..it turns out I was right. So, how many elements could I have been aware of here ahead of the potential accident?

For one, it could be an awareness of the visual line of sight of the other driver entering the space in front of me, and the attendent lack of awareness that he has as a thought being carried on his line of vision, to stop or control his vehicle. (think being aware a stranger is looking/staring at you...and then add the theory of vision as being not just passive, but a combination of information carried to your retina and being returned out similar to radar..continously) It could be purely the principle of non-locality, being aware of anothers thoughts in a seperate place at the same time and recognizing this because the person was about to enter my actual circle of life imminently.

How many can we list?

This subject is an object closer in your mental mirror than it appears. I couldn't resist that word play :-D

True Wireless
02-18-2005, 10:33 PM
Here is one more idea to chew on I have. Think P2P networks (peer to peer) in the computer realm. A man named Bram Cohen wrote a common sense protocol called Bit Torrent that is being espoused as a radical new paradigm in the way file sharing is done.

Bram's site: http://bittorrent.com

Wired article on Bit Torrent: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.01/bittorrent.html

Headline to article:

The BitTorrent Effect
Movie studios hate it. File-swappers love it. Bram Cohen's blazing-fast P2P software has turned the Internet into a universal TiVo. For free video-on-demand, just click here.
By Clive ThompsonPage 1 of 5 next »

____________________________

This cracks me up. Bram's work is sooo very common sense, it is amazing it didn't exist before he wrote it around 2001 or so. That's all it is...common sense and logic.

My point here is not to argue the pros and cons of this or get into why movie studios hate it and all that. My point is to show the correlation of what Bit Torrent does to REG on a macro scale, and how this can then be miniaturized to the individual and how we pick up information around us all the time.

In a nutshell, the old file swapping was one machine to one machine and was slow, bandwidth restraints of uploading and downloading determined the linear length of time to transmit a complete "file" or piece of information.

Bit Torrent works by sending many different parts of the file from all machines connected by this software, thus the recieving machine is not dependent on just one transmitting machine or its' bandwidth limitations. Thus the file is provided at a rapid rate to the requesting machine because it is coming from all different directions simeltaneously.

Now think of this as applied to REG and mass consciousness!! Now think of this in a smaller way in your individual life!!

BTW in defense of the movie studios here, there assets are copyrighted material that should receive compensation for all involved in creating it. The artists, writers all the way through to the studios....I don't mean to throw any negative light on that subject though you may think about it. Piracy is a real problem...and that is why this software is a problem in my opinion. It is rampant.

Although it is also interesting from other perspectives best left for later.

Still, my view is it is interesting how these many things seem to converge from my perspective. Now I may be totally wrong...but that is what I am looking for when putting forth my ideas.

I see a learning model useful for gaining more insight into how we tick here, expressly from a mass/individual consciousness point of view.