PDA

View Full Version : Corporations: Powerful... and Certifiable



Dr Powerfun
08-25-2010, 03:46 PM
(From 2007) Excerpted from
Corporations Need Treatment, Documentary Argues
by Stephen Leahy at ipsnews.net (http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=22001)

"Corporations are not only the most powerful institutions in the world, they are also psychopathic, a new Canadian documentary on globalisation elegantly argues.

While the corporation has the rights and responsibilities of 'a legal person', its owners and shareholders are not liable for its actions. Moreover, the film explains, a corporation's directors are legally required to do what is best for the company, regardless of the harm created.

What kind of person would a corporation be? A clinical psychopath, answers the documentary, which is now playing in four Canadian theatres.

'Everything we do in the world is touched by corporations in some way,' says 'The Corporation' writer Joel Bakan.

Six years ago he was researching a book on the subject and teamed up with documentary makers Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott, and then set out to drum up enough money to make the film and to do more than 40 interviews.

'Corporations are the most dominant institutions on the planet today. We thought it was worth taking a close look at what that means,' Bakan told IPS.

In law, today's corporations are treated like a person: they can buy and sell property, have the right to free expression and most other rights that individuals have.

This legal creativity came as a result of U.S. businesses using the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution -- designed to protect blacks in the U.S. South after the Civil War -- to proclaim that corporations should be treated as 'persons'.

The filmmakers show four examples of corporations at work -- including garment sweatshops in Honduras and Indonesia -- to demonstrate that this 'legal person' is inherently amoral, callous and deceitful.

The corporation, the film points out, ignores any social and legal standards to get its way, and does not suffer from guilt while mimicking the human qualities of empathy, caring and altruism.

A person with those character traits would be categorised as a psychopath, based on diagnostic criteria from the World Health Organisation (WHO), points out the film.
...
But the film is not a rant. It gives ample time to corporate chief executive officers (CEOs) and representatives of right-wing organisations, like Canada's Fraser Institute.

Fraser's Michael Walker tells viewers that hungry people in the developing world are better off when a sweatshop pays them 10 cents an hour to make brand name goods that sell for hundreds of dollars.

And it is just good business sense that a corporation moves to seek out more hungry people when its workers demand higher wages and better working conditions, Walker argues.

Many others are less ruthless. Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, former chairman of Royal Dutch Shell, is honestly concerned about protecting the environment. Under his guidance, Shell adopted many green initiatives and a commitment to developing renewable energy..

At the same time, Ken Saro Wiwa and eight other activists were hung in Nigeria for protesting Shell Oil's pollution of the Niger Delta.

Social critic and linguist Noam Chomsky -- the subject of Achbar's 1992 award-winning 'Manufacturing Consent' -- carefully points out that people who work for corporations, and even those who run them, are often very nice people.

The same could have been said about many slave owners, he observes. The institution -- not the people -- is the problem, Chomsky argues.

Eminent economist Milton Friedman sums up the role of the corporation succinctly: it creates jobs and wealth but is inherently incapable of dealing with the social consequences of its actions.

'The Corporation' documents a bewildering array of these consequences -- including the deaths of citizens who protest corporate ownership of their water in Cochabamba, Bolivia -- that demonstrate the extent and power of today's corporations.

It looks at the often-cosy relationships between corporations and fascist regimes, such as that of IBM and Nazil leader Adolph Hitler.

It demonstrates the power of advertising to create desires for luxury items, as well as how corporations can suppress information.

The documentary shows agri-business corporation Monsanto successfully preventing the news media from airing a story about the potential health hazards of a genetically engineered drug given to many U.S. diary cows.

'The Corporation' also tells a number of success stories, including activists' successful fight to overturn corporate patents on the neem tree and basmati rice.

Bolivia's Oscar Olivera describes how citizens of Cochabamba city re-took control of their water. The lesson, he explains, is the people's capacity for 'reflection, rage and rebellion' as an effective counter to corporate globalisation.

That is one of the film's messages, says Bakan. 'We want people to understand that they can change things.'

'Everyone keeps thanking us for making the film,' says Mark Achbar, from the Sundance festival of independent films in Utah state.

'People are fed up with being talked down to and enjoy being intellectually engaged,' he adds, trying to explain the documentary's popularity and several international festival awards.

Despite its current limited distribution in Canada, 'The Corporation' has been sold as a three-part, one-hour TV series to international markets, and Achbar is hoping it will be translated into Spanish.

Of course, there will not be a multi-million marketing campaign. The number of people who will see it will depend on those who have, spreading the word."

'The Corporation' Website: http://thecorporation.com/

Dr Powerfun
08-25-2010, 03:48 PM
Excerpted from
You are what you enable /
A review of The Corporation
by Chuck Richardson at buffalobeast.com (http://www.buffalobeast.com/56/corp.htm)

"There are two messages—one explicit, the other implicit—in The Corporation, a documentary film by Mark Achbar, Jennifer Abbott and Joel Bakan.

The explicit point is that if corporations are people, then they are psychopaths. ... The film's tacit suggestion, however, is that the people who work for them and/or buy into corporate philosophy—as producers and/or consumers—are also psychopathic, or at least possess many of the same symptoms (you are, in part, what you enable).

... The Corporation's imagined audience is open-ended, appealing to honest, hard working folks worldwide, many of them corporate employees or beneficiaries themselves.

Since corporations are global entities, the film focuses on their planetary and species-wide effects ...

And it does this all in a way that allows us to feel our complicity in failing to resist the rise of totalitarianism in our societies. We are like the pre-Stalinist soviets and Weimar Germans before us.

In many ways, The Corporation reveals how decent people permit such inhumane systems. ... In its first part, the film employs the most commonly used chart by mental health professionals for diagnosing psychopathy, checking off the symptoms as the mélange of images and talking heads gradually render the logical verdict.

The corporation, the right wing economist Milton Friedman tells us, can’t be any more socially responsible than a building, so asking it to be something it can’t be is absurd (but buildings aren’t legal persons!). One can’t expect it to behave in a lawful way or put the common interests of the public and planet ahead of the private interests of its financial profiteers. Its primary reason for being is to make them money, it is legally bound to do so, and it’s the primary law they adhere to. Because they don’t give a sh!t about how others feel about them, and have no faculty for long-term relationships or thinking, and recklessly jeopardize the health of all living things, are deceitful without feeling any guilt, corporations are psychopathic outlaws.
...
Renowned progressive historian Howard Zinn reminds us, as if we already knew, of course, that European fascism rose with the help of corporations. Does claiming that one didn’t know what was going on or that one was just following orders hold up in the end?
...
But why and how can a corporation be considered a 'person' and subjected to such an analysis, you ask? The filmmakers anticipated their audience’s resistance, thankfully, providing a perhaps too brief sketch of how corporations became legal persons in the United States.

Basically, corporate lawyers used the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which recognized the rights of former slaves to be protected equally under the laws of the land in order to gain greater power for their business clients. Equal protection meant that corporations—as citizens of the United States—had certain inalienable rights, among them free speech and protection from search and seizure of their private 'persons' (i.e.: property) by government agencies without due process of law.

So it didn’t take long for them to take everything over in the U.S. since they live longer, accumulate far more wealth and exercise far greater mobility than other types of people, whose flesh and blood physical constraints prevent them from competing with corporations for life, liberty and happiness.

OK, one might say, 'But that’s just business. It’s economics. What’s it got to do with politics and my civil liberties? How does that affect me?'

The Corporation addresses these issues and assumptions by presenting the views of a wide range of people. You might see yourself somewhere in this film. Philosophers, corporate executives, Bolivian activists, college students, academics, farmers, housewives and others are interviewed, revealing through their own stories, words and actions the insanity that’s killing the world.

For one who has never thought of our principal institution this way, the prospect that society’s dominant cultural system is psychopathic and forcing us to become psychopaths ourselves by behaving the way we do, is unnerving.
...
The Corporation serves as something of an unsentimental mirror image of America’s perception of the world and its existence. It’s time we help ourselves heal before others intervene for us.

Cheers."

Dr Powerfun
08-25-2010, 03:51 PM
Is your boss a 'corporate psycho'?
Story from BBC NEWS:
Published: 2004/01/13 13:49:16 GMT

"Millions of harassed workers could have their worst fears confirmed about their bosses thanks to a new test to weed out the 'corporate psycho'.

You may already suspect that your boss's smooth, charming exterior masks a sadistic control freak with a penchant for violence.

But help is at hand to stop mad, megalomaniac managers going completely bananas and scampering off with the company pension fund.

Two of the world's leading experts on psychopathy have developed a new 107-point questionnaire to identify which desks those smooth-talking 'snakes in suits' might be hiding behind.

Psycho scanner

The 'B-Scan', which stands for Business Scan, has been designed by Professor Robert Hare and Dr Paul Babiak, both experts in psychopathic disorders.

It follows on from the 'P-Scan' which is now considered to be the standard test for detecting criminals with psychopathic leanings.

Professor Hare estimates that 1% of the general population in North America are psychopaths.

The professor believes that psychopath's cold-blooded ability to manipulate others without remorse, coupled with a veneer of charm and high energy can make them extremely successful in many walks of life.

They could be perfectly qualified for top posts in the military, politics or in huge multi-national companies as history has already shown in one notorious case.

Former Daily Mirror tycoon Robert Maxwell, who made off with the newspaper's pension fund, was named as a classic example of a man in a powerful position who might very well have displayed psychopathic traits.

Telltale signals

BBC Five Live asked Dr Paul Babiak, one of the two psychologists who devised the B-scan, how to spot if a boss has psychopathic tendencies.

'I'm not going to tell you that it's easy,' Dr Babiak cautioned.

'Like many people in business they have strong egos, high energy and are somewhat narcissistic...all these things are valued in business.'

'But the psychopath has a darker side behind that almost like a Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde effect'

Traits to look out for amongst your colleagues in the workplace are 'glimpses of insincerity, arrogance, manipulative behaviour, lack of guilt or remorse', he said.

These are characteristics that a lot of us display at some time, but according to Dr Babiak the psychopath exhibits these tendencies throughout every aspect of their lives.

Stuck like glue

Once they have their talons dug into a company they may be too well connected politically to shift, hiding their dangerous natures behind a network of influence and manipulation.

However, Professor Hare stressed that some organisations would highly value these traits.

'Used car salesmen, for example, need to be cut-throat,' he pointed out.

'The major problem is that psychopaths get into organisations very well as they interview well and can convince people they are right for the job.

'But as soon as the person is hired, all sorts of problems start.'"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3392233.stm

fabucat
08-25-2010, 10:01 PM
This is such excellent material! Thank you for posting it!

I'd be willing to "give up" the birthright citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment and also outlaw the "corporate personhood" that's supposedly enshrined in that Amendment.

This isn't anti-capitalist. Economies controlled by multi-national corporations aren't capitalistic, they're fascistic.