PDA

View Full Version : The Truth About "Diversity" ...????



Alpha
06-26-2006, 04:05 PM
This at minimum is a controversial thread and topic.

However since this is a discussion forum, this topic may merit some dialogue and debate.

Makow makes some interesting yet perhaps convtroversial points and observations in the article below.

Although this article may fly directly opposite to the face of political correctness, Makow does give one something to think about.

Is he correct in his conclusions? Do you agree with part or parts of what he writes? Is he just a sexist, racist, white Judeo/Christian supremacist....... just plain homophobic, etc....or somewhere in between??

What do you think?
The Truth About "Diversity"

By Henry Makow PHD

6-25-6

We are all affected by "Diversity" but few understand its true nature.

Warning: It isn't pretty.

"Diversity" is a massive long-term mind control program posing as 'equal rights" designed ultimately to disinherit nations of European and Christian origin.

While it pretends to advocate equality, its real goal is to use guilt to trick heterosexual White males into passively yielding power and position to women and minorities. The object is to prepare North America and Europe for inclusion in a "world government" run by the central banking cartel based in London.

This private cartel's power is measured by the fact that virtually every major corporation, educational institution and government agency provides "diversity training" (i.e. political reeducation) to its employees. Even though studies show it has zero economic benefit, they spend eight billion dollars a year on it. Toyota alone plans to spend that much in the next ten years.


Here is an example of the shaming that takes place in these sessions. It is from the text, "Seeing Ourselves: Exploring Race Ethnicity and Culture"(1999) by Carl James.

A participant, Greg, tells the group:

"As for my race, I am white but I never really had to think about it before. I don't feel that it ever affected the people with whom I associated or talked to. My two best friends are Black and (Canadian) Indian. I was brought up in a family that didn't believe in prejudice and I'm proud of that. If I don't like a person, it is because of their personality, not their race or heritage."

Now you'd think that Greg would pass with flying colors.

You didn't consider the hidden agenda. The author, a Diversity trainer, chastises Greg for assuming he is "the norm." Greg fails to acknowledge his "race privilege," that "invisible package of unearned assets" that is the "white colonial legacy." Whites like Greg deny "the ways in which they socially, culturally and politically /produce relations of domination/." (p.44 my emphasis)

In other words, Whites naturally oppress other people. That sounds like racism to me.

Can you see what's happening? These Diversity sessions lay guilt trips on Whites, especially males, so they will yield power to compliant members of "minorities" who have not earned it. This is a scam. Anyone who objects commits career suicide. That's political persecution.

I want to be clear that I think the human race is one family and God loves all people equally. Like Greg, I believe people should be judged on their merit alone, regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation.I have no problem with "minorities" winning positions of power so long as they do it fairly. I welcome the rich contribution immigrants make.

But "Diversity" is not about fairness or enriching society. It promotes minorities not for their own sake, but as a way to subvert the majority.



IRONY


It's ironic that the central banking clique should lay this guilt trip on Whites when it is they who are responsible for imperialism and wars. It is they who grew rich through the slave and opium trades. Their crimes against humanity are unspeakable.

The US population is more than 75% White. The plan is for Whites to become a minority by 2050 or sooner. Whites are expected to stand by and become guests on their own house.

When Whites are a minority, no one will champion their rights. There are two million more females than males at US universities. Have you heard of any affirmative action programs for males?

"Diversity" is practically unheard of in China, Japan, Israel, India and Latin America. These countries are allowed to keep their racial character. But because people of European origin have a sense of material, spiritual and political privilege, they are the hardest to absorb in the New World Order. They are the targets of the Diversity program.

The central bankers use the tactic of "divide and conquer" to undermine the four pillars of our identity: race, religion, nation and family.

First, they pretended to champion the workers to get rid of the traditional order, e.g. the Tsarist regime in Russia. Then they pretended to champion women and homosexuals to undermine heterosexual values and the family. Finally they are duping Whites into passively accepting discrimination and a greatly diminished status.

They use the same dog-eared play book. (Select one) Workers, Jews, Blacks, homosexuals, women have been oppressed for centuries. Let the bankers put their (select one) front men (or womyn) in power.


SIGNS OF 'DIVERSITY'

Understanding Diversity helps us to understand our world. For instance, at the city library. there was a placard on every counter affirming the importance of "respectful behavior."

The signs bewildered me. I wasn't planning to "dis" the library clerk. Now I understand where this weirdness comes from. It means we must /show respect for/ women, gays and minorities. The crippled colored lesbian deserves our respect most. On the other hand, the straight white male is the Rodney Dangerfield of Diversity.

But, you say, don't "white males" run the world? White males are becoming less important. For example, women now account for about half the enrollment in professional programs such as law, medicine and optometry. That is up from 22 percent a generation ago. Women have overtaken men in Commerce degrees http://www.diversityinc.com/public/21543.cfm

In general, White or not, success today depends on your willingness to betray your society and advance the central banker agenda. In Communist terms <http://www.savethemales.ca/000185.html, minorities and feminists are today's "useful idiots."

Similarly I wonder about the recurrent "anti bullying" propaganda. Bullying didn't require legislation when I was growing up. It could be dealt with using common sense. Again, I wonder if the hidden agenda is to create an atmosphere where White heterosexuals cannot resist domination by homosexual and other minority activists.


CONCLUSION

Malleable and conformist, the masses will usually adopt the norm. When evil people set the norm, the masses will succumb to distorted and self-destructive behavior.

The banking cartel creates money using our national credit. As a result, society has been subverted by an alien power with a anti-human agenda. Our poltical and kultural elites consist of traitors who, for example, allowed 9-11 to take place and covered it up. We are subjected to a constant stream of lies from these sanctimonious self serving pawns.

We live in an increasingly Orwellian society. "Diversity" doesn't mean true diversity. It is doublespeak for discriminating against the majority. "Inclusiveness" doesn?t include celebrating European or Christian heritage.

The founding peoples of the West have a right to maintain their national character and see it flourish. Immigrants expect to integrate, while retaining their heritage. They don't expect to be used to subvert the majority.

So, let's not fall into their "divide and conquer" trap by focusing our indignation on minorities. They are manipulated as much as we. Let's focus on the central bankers and their lackeys, in politics, education, business and the media.

I know this goes against the grain for some. Ask yourself where did you get your attitudes. They were dinned into you by the media and education. We are being manipulated and duped and it's time we awoke.

--------

See also: "How the Elite Plays God" http://www.savethemales.ca/001487.html


Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com

------------------------

What do You think?!?! **please note that no offence is intended or implied to any group, minority, majority, nationality etc., by the posting of this topic and article **

Project
06-26-2006, 04:20 PM
its real goal is to use guilt to trick heterosexual White males into passively yielding power and position to women and minorities.


Well then I am all for it! Bring on the New World Order!!! Too bad the new world order is run by these same people you claim are being disenfranchised, but let's not get tied up in facts...

What else can one say? I think he has no valid point whatsoever. He is a classic xenophobe, a misogynist and a damned fool.

What do you think?

Grim Jim
06-26-2006, 05:14 PM
I don't think race should play a factor in welfare programs.

I know of a friend of mine who is of European ancestry and whose parents are just above the income line to be denied monetary assistance for school. His family is by no means "well off" and they have to really tighten their belts to afford the tuition and schoolbooks (the real money maker for the schools). Had he been born a minority, a factor totally out of his control, he could go to school at an affordable rate.

Another friend of mine in the same class was of East Indian descent and had pretty wealthy parents. They were able to receive a free ride for her school tuition and books due to her racial profile and they did not even need it.

I think that financial aid should be determined on financial need alone not racial heritage.

Project
06-26-2006, 05:52 PM
I agree Jim, but if you look at a statistic that says one group is systematically denied something they have a right to, what do you do in that situation? Just as an example, the 'glass ceiling' - a subject 'Dr.' Makow has written at length I seem to remember? I guess you can claim that was a myth, then how about slavery? I guess the point is that if there is a rule saying one group is to be singled out and persecuted (whether written or unwritten... slavery was written, glass ceiling unwritten), then laws should be passed to reverse those rules. The actual implementation and language of those laws is open to discussion, but I do believe they should be put into place. Just saying 'no discrimination' doesn't seem to work, what other avenue is there?

Grim Jim
06-27-2006, 05:57 PM
I think that hiring should be done on experience and skill level alone. It is unfair to discriminate against one race to help even out the playing field for another. What choice does anyone have when it comes to what race they are born into? None. Why should a white person be passed over for a job that they are more qualified for and a less qualified minority be hired?

Take the example of the previous hiring practices of the San Francisco Orchestra to illustrate how silly raced based hiring is. A civil rights group told them they were not hiring enough minorities and that they had to make their orchestra more diverse.

The orchestra told the civil rights group that their hiring is done completely anonymously. They number the applicants and then randomly have them play behind a curtain so that their merit and skill alone could be judged.

Despite the fact that the hiring was done on merit and skill alone the civil rights group balked at this and stated that a number of minorities must be put aside and hired not on the content of their character or their abilities but the color of their skin.

Completely ridiculous. There have been many times when firemen and police officers have been passed over for promotions that they rightly deserved so that a less qualified minority could be moved up to fill a racial quota.

Discrimination to end discrimination? That makes no sense...

Project
06-27-2006, 10:51 PM
Yes, I only said there should be legislation to protect groups who are obviously either at higher risk, or with less prospects. Hiring practices should be sane hopefully.

I am basically just saying it is incredibly complex, but I feel that we have to see there is a disparity, and that being black makes it a much different world, and this is not fair either.

Alpha
07-03-2006, 08:48 PM
Well then I am all for it! Bring on the New World Order!!! Too bad the new world order is run by these same people you claim are being disenfranchised, but let's not get tied up in facts...

What else can one say? I think he has no valid point whatsoever. He is a classic xenophobe, a misogynist and a damned fool.

What do you think?


Even if he is P....I don't see it that way.

Perhaps he's using these examples to illustrate at a much higher altitude.

Despite that I don't like how Makow has verbalized some of his points via verbal illustration, I think one his main points is how the PTB polarize groups, nationalities, folks with any commonality and difference to homogonize and dillute it .....take the spirit out of anyone who stands for anything be it right, wrong etc., where there is no longer any unity, perhaps even within self.

Now I'm not saying that the former paradigm of nationality, religion, race, gender, country etc., is a good thing.

Likely we need to shed that to ever get close to a type one civilization.

However that said, this is not the agenda me thinks. ;)