have you ever noticed the difference between bbc news and the news that we get here? here's a snippet from the associated press website:
"The Associated Press is the backbone of the world's information system serving thousands of daily newspaper, radio, television and online customers with coverage in all media and news in all formats. It is the largest and oldest news organization in the world, serving as a source of news, photos, graphics, audio and video."
". AP is owned by its 1,500 U.S. daily newspaper members. They elect a board of directors that directs the cooperative."
in a very literal sense, there's really no denying that america is #1 at propaganda. we are a world-wide media powerhouse. we have made "the american dream" a global mis-nomer. advertising is propaganda. surely a reasonable gent such as yourself can see this is true.
div, i would echo project's point above. religions are just man-made, mere artifice. we cannot hope to explain the mind and will of god with simple words, so any organized religion must fall short. for many, it's a starting place and not the destination, so i can't begrudge them that. it seems silly to me to condemn the entire religion just because some have been manipulated with it to commit atrocious acts.
you keep using that word "specious" like it's some kind of defense. first with judee and now with me. let's be clear. i've known a few devout muslims. they were very peaceful and in touch with themselves and expressed nothing but love and tolerance. i know that this is not the case with all muslims. so what? if you'd like a real example of a specious argument, look to your "hyperbole" that you mentioned earlier. i'd imagine that we can agree that we shouldn't stoop to the level of the terrorists. so is there any real point in comparing what some nutjobs (who happened to be muslims) did to some americans (ie, chopping off heads) and what we do to them (ie waterboarding)? no, there's really no point. see? it looks like a plausible argument when you first look at it (that's because of the extreme visceral reaction, i believe), but it's really completely inconsequential and almost diversionary.
and finally, i don't really like to think of it in terms of "winning" or "losing" at all. i like to think that i use logic, facts, and analytical thinking to persuade others out of their emotional, knee-jerk stances. if it gives you a moment's pause, i'd be happy. and it was very nice of you to admit that you think that i'm winning.

Bookmarks