Declassified CIA documents show Mind Control Projects created Super Spies, Terrorists, Assassins

[Alpha]

Well, well, well......

Declassified CIA documents show Mind Control Projects created Super Spies, Terrorists, Assassins

Part 1 of series. The astonishing quotes from CIA documents below reveal detailed, successful experiments in highly secret, government-sponsored mind control programs. Through hypnosis, drugs, and electric shock, CIA clinicians fractured personalities and induced multiple personality disorder (MPD). These top secret programs were successful in creating Manchurian Candidates or super spies programmed to carry out sexual favors, assassination, and other terrorist acts without any conscious knowledge of what they were doing.

To verify this startling information, links are provided to images of the revealing original documents. Instructions are also available here to order for yourself any of these documents directly from the CIA using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The vast majority of official documents from these mind control programs were destroyed by the order of then CIA director Richard Helms after hearing there would be a Congressional investigation. He did not realize, however, that incriminating evidence remained in the financial files of the programs, which are what you read below. We can only imagine what secrets the destroyed documents held.

......................

CIA document and page number: 190684, pp. 1, 4
Title: Outline of Special H Cases
Date: 7 January 1953
Link to view images of original: Page 1, Page 4
In a general request for volunteers [deleted names] volunteered for H [hypnosis] experimentation and were originally tested on 21 May 1951. Both girls, at this time, were nineteen years of age. These subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can pass from a fully awake state to a deep H controlled state via the telephone, via some very subtle signal that cannot be detected by other persons in the room, and without the other individuals being able to note the change.

It has been shown clearly that physically individuals can be induced into H by telephone, by receiving written matter, or by the use of code, signal, or words. Control of those hypnotized can be passed from one individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been shown by experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for information purposes, and that they can be conditioned to a point where they believe a change in identity on their part even on the polygraph.

Note: This documents shows that CIA experimenters were successful in hypnotizing young women (19 years old in this case) to do things they would not do normally without any memory. Though they volunteered, these women were thus programmed to be Manchurian Candidates or super spies with no knowledge of what these men were doing to them.

Article continues/complete article

[majorion]

Isn't funny how these intelligence branches always destroy the core evidence and material? ...

If the truth (and I mean Truth) got out in the public domain and mainstream about WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON in this heaven/hell reality we live in.. there will definitely be riots all around the world.

On the bright side.. after the riots and panic subdue..... then there should be a new era of reality.

So the question is... Were the Mayans right about 2012? .. Is something really gonna happen? ... I'm starting to get convinced frankly.

Thanks Alpha.. another fantastic thread! .. Perhaps next you could show us some 2012 related stuff?

[Topper]

My memory of who the real Val Thor was is based upon one Bluebird interrogation back in 1953.

[RedDog]

Here is an interesting twist on the abhorent mind control studies done from 1940's forward. We focus on a possible false overlay to the "why".


It most likely has nothing to do with terrestrial concerns!

It seems outrageous that branches of our government would risk doing these types of illegal experiments for such simplistic motivations involving intelligence work with other human organizations or governments.

What does make sense in the ET piece. How often have we heard about ET abductions which the abductee recounts their lost time and inability to control their bodies?

If that kind of advanced natural or artifical technology exists, our intelligence services would be tasked with finding a way to defend against it. We cound not risk having our leaders coopted by some alien mind ray.

Sure there are also many reports of abductee's who talk about "men in black", but all those reports are overlaid with the abductee's conscious interpretation. Whitley is always talking about his experience with Owl's who end up being Alien's, so there is some kind of functional mental overlay which colors the truth.

I would be very concerned about not being in control mentally, if confronted with a superior technology or intellect.

[Alpha]

Here is an interesting twist on the abhorent mind control studies done from 1940's forward. We focus on a possible false overlay to the "why".


It most likely has nothing to do with terrestrial concerns!

It seems outrageous that branches of our government would risk doing these types of illegal experiments for such simplistic motivations involving intelligence work with other human organizations or governments.

What does make sense in the ET piece. How often have we heard about ET abductions which the abductee recounts their lost time and inability to control their bodies?

If that kind of advanced natural or artifical technology exists, our intelligence services would be tasked with finding a way to defend against it. We cound not risk having our leaders coopted by some alien mind ray.

Sure there are also many reports of abductee's who talk about "men in black", but all those reports are overlaid with the abductee's conscious interpretation. Whitley is always talking about his experience with Owl's who end up being Alien's, so there is some kind of functional mental overlay which colors the truth.

I would be very concerned about not being in control mentally, if confronted with a superior technology or intellect.

Interesting theory Red Dog :thinking

Certainly could be a possibility I guess, however are you implying that all this horrific experimentation was done for altruistic purpose to protect humanity from ETI and possibly ETI technology? Perhaps I'm not understanding.....

[RedDog]

In a way, yes. But altruism has nothing to do with defense. These would become necessary casualties of the conflict. If the war is over our soul and minds, you cannot use monkey's to test. It would make more sense to use children, as they lack most of the conditioned overlays which impact the reality of their experience.

If it is a war, then at some point we would have had to make a determination of "friend or foe". If most of this kind of perception of non terestial biological entities occured in the last 80 years, we would see them differently than our ancient ancestors. We would not see them as Gods, Angels or Demons, but as evolved creations of the greater universe. Not as Good or Evil, but as entities with an agenda. This may be part of the problem, as we have complicated the picture and assigned our humanization standards or filters to them.

Good or Evil, Friend or Foe, we tend towards some cut and dry, black and white definitions of those not like us. If ET's exist then we can be assured that any governing human body would work to define them in those terms.
Your either for us or against us. Rather than simply "not us".

What bothers me about myself, is that I can see the cold logic of a need to defend our existence in ways which would appear horrific on the surface. This is often called an enlightened perspective, or illuminated perspective. This also is often a hallmark of the illuminati. That self same cold logic of preservation of humanity. But at what cost? That is what sets me apart from those that talk about "useless eaters", I can see their point, but I'm always aware of the cost to one's soul.

If the universe is unfolding as it should, then who am I to try and change or stop it.

[earthist]

Here is an interesting twist on the abhorent mind control studies done from 1940's forward. We focus on a possible false overlay to the "why".


It most likely has nothing to do with terrestrial concerns!

It seems outrageous that branches of our government would risk doing these types of illegal experiments for such simplistic motivations involving intelligence work with other human organizations or governments.

What does make sense in the ET piece. How often have we heard about ET abductions which the abductee recounts their lost time and inability to control their bodies?

If that kind of advanced natural or artifical technology exists, our intelligence services would be tasked with finding a way to defend against it. We cound not risk having our leaders coopted by some alien mind ray.

Sure there are also many reports of abductee's who talk about "men in black", but all those reports are overlaid with the abductee's conscious interpretation. Whitley is always talking about his experience with Owl's who end up being Alien's, so there is some kind of functional mental overlay which colors the truth.

I would be very concerned about not being in control mentally, if confronted with a superior technology or intellect.

I have spent time on Streiber's forum off and on for several years. I have also talked at great length via email with one person in particular who had much to say about this very topic. I wonder how much you yourself know and are not saying. If your idea came from simple reasoning, I dub you a genius. If so, I can tell you there is much more truth than you imagine in this. If you are speaking from experience, then, of course you know the truth of which you speak.

I am bound by confidentiality promises (not military type, but personal requests to not reveal private conversations), but let me propose another wrinkle to your idea: What if it were aliens themselves who were driving at least some of these "experiments?" What if half of the atrocities were done as a ruse behind which to hide the other half; the real work they wanted done?

It's no violation of confidentiality to say that neither I, nor the victims, know for certain whether the experiments were run as a defense project against the aliens or as a cooperative effort with them. I can also say freely that there are some really messed up folks out there as a result of these atrocities. Whatever the real purpose was, and whoever actually "drove" the so-called MK-Ultra project, the results cannot possibly justify the means IMO.

If you're an experiencer, I'd love to talk privately with you. If not, you should know you're on to something.

[RedDog]

I have spent time on Streiber's forum off and on for several years. I have also talked at great length via email with one person in particular who had much to say about this very topic. I wonder how much you yourself know and are not saying. If your idea came from simple reasoning, I dub you a genius. If so, I can tell you there is much more truth than you imagine in this. If you are speaking from experience, then, of course you know the truth of which you speak.

I'm no genius, nor do I have direct experience, but I can follow a logical chain of thoughts and events, even when spread over a long time line and across many borders. I've only pieced together some of the truth from the plethora of "facts" that are floating out there. It is not reasoning as much as it is filtering. There is allot of crap that has to be filtered to find the real nuggets of truth. I've also become aware than my own filters have been tampered with, not overtly, so much as covertly.

I am bound by confidentiality promises (not military type, but personal requests to not reveal private conversations), but let me propose another wrinkle to your idea: What if it were aliens themselves who were driving at least some of these "experiments?" What if half of the atrocities were done as a ruse behind which to hide the other half; the real work they wanted done?

If your perspective is more true than mine, then it implies factions or at the very least, more than one external interested party. It would be the only reason to link up with what would have normally been classified as a potential enemy. We humans have a saying, "keep your friends close and your enemies closer" for a good reason. This paridigm would have been applied to any ET incursions. Cooperation at a price. We may also have not been given a choice. I keep thinking back to the old movie "The Day The Earth Stood Still". If faced with what appears to be insurmountable odds, we have only three choices. Only two of which any government would consider.

It's no violation of confidentiality to say that neither I, nor the victims, know for certain whether the experiments were run as a defense project against the aliens or as a cooperative effort with them. I can also say freely that there are some really messed up folks out there as a result of these atrocities. Whatever the real purpose was, and whoever actually "drove" the so-called MK-Ultra project, the results cannot possibly justify the means IMO.

I'm of the opinion that if true, then both reasons are at play. It is both a defense and a cooperative effort. Everything they do, implies intent and motivation. The experiencers are the least effective judges of those driving forces IMO.

[RomanKorvinus]

Here is an interesting twist on the abhorent mind control studies done from 1940's forward. We focus on a possible false overlay to the "why".


It most likely has nothing to do with terrestrial concerns!

It seems outrageous that branches of our government would risk doing these types of illegal experiments for such simplistic motivations involving intelligence work with other human organizations or governments.

What does make sense in the ET piece. How often have we heard about ET abductions which the abductee recounts their lost time and inability to control their bodies?

If that kind of advanced natural or artifical technology exists, our intelligence services would be tasked with finding a way to defend against it. We cound not risk having our leaders coopted by some alien mind ray.

Sure there are also many reports of abductee's who talk about "men in black", but all those reports are overlaid with the abductee's conscious interpretation. Whitley is always talking about his experience with Owl's who end up being Alien's, so there is some kind of functional mental overlay which colors the truth.

I would be very concerned about not being in control mentally, if confronted with a superior technology or intellect.

Things like this are done for one reason, counter intellegence. And in so doing the experiments could possibly change the medical, electronic, philosophical, and various other fields that deal with human interaction and genetic make up. Everything we have or know is built on the foundation of failure. The tests are good for one reason, to make sure it can be cleaned up quickly. Down side is a prick in suit feels the need to get rich and elelminate some poor shlub who just happens to have a brilliant idea.

[RedDog]

Things like this are done for one reason, counter intellegence. And in so doing the experiments could possibly change the medical, electronic, philosophical, and various other fields that deal with human interaction and genetic make up. Everything we have or know is built on the foundation of failure. The tests are good for one reason, to make sure it can be cleaned up quickly. Down side is a prick in suit feels the need to get rich and elelminate some poor shlub who just happens to have a brilliant idea.

Not really sure what you are talking about RK. Other than the term counter intelligence. Aquistion of knowledge by us or them is a similar process. Humans have the unique ability to gain knowledge by means which cannot be thwarted. Once those in power saw that there was knowledge unknown to them, they would have developed a plan to aquire that knowledge. Most likely by any means necessary.