A Question - What does Your Post have to do with Definitions of Apparitions?Originally Posted by Sierra
Ninja, I have a right to my opinion. You accused me of flaming you simply because I disagreed with you. Your bad, not mine.
I have never understood that statement that less is more. Oh, I get the context that shutting up after making a point instead of expounding on it makes the point sometimes better than the rationale behind the point.
But that statement doesn't hold true in all respects. For instance, let's talk about a forest. If a forest consists of one tree, is it really a forest? No, not at all. It is just a tree in a field.
But if there are thousands of trees on vast tracks of land is that considered a forest?
Yes because that is the definition of a forest.
So in this case more is more. Less is not more, in fact in this case calling a lone tree in a field a forest is confusing and very demeaning to the field, which certainly prefers being called a field and not a forest which it is not.
In the Four Agreements, one of the agreements was that we agreed on a mutual language and what certain sounds contained within that language would mean certain ideas. We call these sounds words and sometimes phrases to get an idea across.
To call a lone tree in a field a forest would just confuse people as we have all agreed that land empty of most trees is considered a field not a forest. To call a forest a field without adding the words "of trees" to the phrase would just call to mind an empty field devoid of most or all trees.
So this is a clear case of more is more. More trees, more forest, more understood and an agreed on definition.
Less is not forest, but an empty or nearly empty field, more understood in the context of communication and an agreed on definition.
So you see there are potentially reasons to use both phrases. Your way is a metaphor for something else. Metaphors are acceptable as they convey ideas in non conventional ways. My way is a valid indication of how literal language works. Neither is wrong, it is just a different turn of phrase.
However, if you still cling to the idea that less is more in all cases, I am more than willing to take part of your paycheck, since you don't need all of it because less is more. In fact by that reasoning you would be better off sending some of it my way. Would you like my PO box?
--- Ninja



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks