Secret Plan for "The Shadow King" - Queen to Pass Duties

[Alpha]

Secret Plan for the Shadow King - Queen to Pass Duties

Prince William to share Queen's duties: Treasury document reveals secret plan to make him the 'Shadow King'

The Queen is to hand over a substantial part of her public duties to Prince William to help him prepare for the day when he becomes King, according to a confidential document obtained by The Mail on Sunday.
Secret papers reveal that plans to ease the strain on the 83-year-old monarch and her 88-year-old husband, Prince Philip, are at an advanced stage.



The disclosures come despite months of denials from the Palace that the Queen was planning to step back from her official work in favour of her 27-year-old grandson.


The information is contained in a briefing note written by Chancellor Alistair Darling’s Treasury officials about new financial arrangements for Prince Charles and his sons.



Key paragraphs, disclosing the reason for the changes, are blacked out.
But this newspaper has obtained an uncensored version of the document which confirms that the Queen is grooming William as a ‘Shadow King’.



....................


The leak will add to speculation that the Queen believes William, rather than Charles, represents the best long-term interests of the monarchy, and will raise new questions about the timing of William’s long-anticipated engagement to his girlfriend Kate Middleton.


Full Article

[VOguy]

Kind of a non-issue, IMHO.

[Judee]

I read something to the effect that Charles was ill... Probably from waking up every morning and having to look at the rottweiler! Hopefully for Kate, William will have more of a warm heart than ol' Charlie boy.

[VOguy]

I read something to the effect that Charles was ill... Probably from waking up every morning and having to look at the rottweiler! Hopefully for Kate, William will have more of a warm heart than ol' Charlie boy.

I think the UK is better off not having Charles in charge. A friend who lives in the U.K. once mused that having Charles as King would be like the U.S. during Nixon.

[Alpha]

Kind of a non-issue, IMHO.

Yeah, guess it is except for perhaps the bloodline implications, secret societies and perhaps a whole bunch of other stuff and then, perhaps again not......yet, whoever cares, or has a different POV, may have something to say about that .....sort of the same "non issues" that keep getting posted in the Funny Worlds - Bozone area of the forum...IMHO....with great regularity.

I have not much interest or use for politic, "monarchy" etc., however that seems to be, atleast to me, in my best CBT who are the major players on this planet......food for thought me thinks.....and why is it seemingly "secret".

Another diversion...media attention to divert from something else? Doesn't really change much though, does it?

The PTB are do what they do, yet most don't see who they really are.....oh well....

[Judee]

I think the UK is better off not having Charles in charge. A friend who lives in the U.K. once mused that having Charles as King would be like the U.S. during Nixon.

Absolutely VO. Ol' Queenie isn't dumb. She knows that 'Charles In Charge' would be deadly to the 'Family'... Charles is like a dysfunctional idiot, whereas William is steady, handsome (sort of), intelligent, and most of all - LOYAL.

[VOguy]

I think William has the most common sense of all of them.

But it's too bad there is this blood line rule, so to speak. It's like our political system. It tends to lower the choices for the best candidate. Barring this, I'll take William over Charles, who seems at time to be sort of soul-less chap.

The reason I think this is a non-issue is that with any transition in power there are this time between the start of the transition until the reigns are handed over. Even in our own political system there are the awkward moments when the transition starts. And during the process there are those that are saying the transition is going too fast, and the new guy is getting in too quick. On the other hand there are some saying that the new guy on the block is not jumping in and learning quick enough. Writers no longer write news, they write opinion, and in most cases those weighing in are looking for a reason to write something, pro and con.

Case in point, there is a half page article in the Toledo Blade claiming that new mayor Michael Bell is attending meetings by the present mayor, Carty Finkbeiner. Some of the writings are claiming that Bell is doing this as sort of a covert action. In reality, he is there simply because in the transition of power it will be necessary for the new regime to know what the old regime had on the plate. For example, the article pointed out that after the Bell got involved they discovered that the city budget is worse than reported. Bad thing? No, jumping into anything without knowledge is a fools paradise.

Then again, I'm sure there will be some who will talk and offer rumors and perhaps write something because at some point I'll have to train the new guy that takes over for me when I'm done with my present work.

[Judee]

I think William has the most common sense of all of them.

Actually, I believe that Harry has the most 'common sense' VO, and the reason I think he does is because his blood isn't quite... err... well, quite up to royal snuff if you get my drift! That fresh blood gave him what it takes to be a real human being. William got a little 'humanity' from mom, but Harry has it all... Strength, humility, courage, compassion, and a great insight into being the 'underdog'.

[VOguy]

Actually, I believe that Harry has the most 'common sense' VO, and the reason I think he does is because his blood isn't quite... err... well, quite up to royal snuff if you get my drift! That fresh blood gave him what it takes to be a real human being. William got a little 'humanity' from mom, but Harry has it all... Strength, humility, courage, compassion, and a great insight into being the 'underdog'.

You could be right. I was suggesting William for some of the positive reasons you gave, and discarding Harry as he tends to be the Wild Child of the family.

[earthist]

Yeah, guess it is except for perhaps the bloodline implications, secret societies and perhaps a whole bunch of other stuff and then, perhaps again not......yet, whoever cares, or has a different POV, may have something to say about that .....sort of the same "non issues" that keep getting posted in the Funny Worlds - Bozone area of the forum...IMHO....with great regularity.

I have not much interest or use for politic, "monarchy" etc., however that seems to be, atleast to me, in my best CBT who are the major players on this planet......food for thought me thinks.....and why is it seemingly "secret".

Another diversion...media attention to divert from something else? Doesn't really change much though, does it?

The PTB are do what they do, yet most don't see who they really are.....oh well....

Wow! That seems a bit harsh.

If we were talking about Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, I could see your point. As the one-time owner of Royal Dutch Shell (it's now a "publicly owned company" ), and a member of the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome, that's a family with power, and you don't see them featured much in the news. There's a reason for that. The real power players tend to keep a low profile.

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...hots/6388.html

The British royals seem pretty powerless, though. They don't own British Petroleum, nor even the Bank of England (the Rothschildes outmaneuvered them centuries ago). I see them as kinda like Britney Spears with a Rolls Royce and footmen. Diversionary in an entertaining sort of way, but powerful -- no. The mere fact that they're in the news every other day is further indication of their irrelevance, too, IMO.

I'm therefor curious what you see that I'm missing on that account?

[MuseNoir]

earthist, I love how you explain things... the Britney Spears analogy is perfect.

As for the situation with the Royal Family, I think it is interesting because it is history happening... and THAT is always interesting to me.

[Alpha]

Wow! That seems a bit harsh.

If we were talking about Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, I could see your point. As the one-time owner of Royal Dutch Shell (it's now a "publicly owned company" ), and a member of the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome, that's a family with power, and you don't see them featured much in the news. There's a reason for that. The real power players tend to keep a low profile.

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...hots/6388.html

The British royals seem pretty powerless, though. They don't own British Petroleum, nor even the Bank of England (the Rothschildes outmaneuvered them centuries ago). I see them as kinda like Britney Spears with a Rolls Royce and footmen. Diversionary in an entertaining sort of way, but powerful -- no. The mere fact that they're in the news every other day is further indication of their irrelevance, too, IMO.

I'm therefor curious what you see that I'm missing on that account?

Harsh? ....well perhaps so, from your perspective, however that was not my intent.....yet yes, it was a "strong" response with exactly that intent....not to be harsh, yet to make a point and object to a seeming dismissal or what this could or could not mean or imply...

Diversionary in an entertaining sort of way, but powerful -- no. The mere fact that they're in the news every other day is further indication of their irrelevance, too, IMO.

WADR, I totally disagree with you on this one. Diversionary tactics are and have been used very successfully to mask, hide what's really going on, that we can even hope to know about that is of real import.

Take this entire Tiger Woods fiasco that is superseding almost all media to the exclusion of The Copenhagen Conference , Climategate, The Norway Spiral......planned, coincidence??...however most would rather debate and disucss Tiger Woods, his sex life, his endorsements or lack thereof....or at minimum in the media here where I live and I find it more than infuriating.

One does not make folks think about other possibilities by always being in agreement and stroking one another....or just talking about the easy and the fun stuff IMO....yet then again I guess I am probably more serious than I should be for my own good...always have been.

Balance of both is important and I'll work on that o.k.!!


Well I can offer this as sources for consideration:

The NWO - An Overview

.............The corporate portion of the NWO pyramid seems to be dominated by international bankers and the big pharmaceutical cartels, as well as other major multinational corporations. The Royal Family of England, namely Queen Elizabeth II and theHouse of Windsor, (whoare, in fact, descendants of the German armof European Royalty -the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family-changed the name to Windsor in 1914 ), are high level players, along with the British oligarchy which controls the upper strata of the Illuminati. The decision making Illuminati nerve centers of this effort are in the London (especially the City of London), Basel Switzerland, and Brussels (NATO headquarters).

The Top of the Pyramid P 12

.............The Supreme World Council.



This council is already set up as a prototype of the one that will rule when the NWO comes into being. It meets on a regular basis to discuss finances, direction, policy, etc. and to problem-solve difficulties that come up. Once again, these leaders are heads in the financial world, OLD banking money. The Rothschild family in England, and in France, have ruling seats. A descendant of the Hapsburg dynasty has a generational seat. A descendant of the ruling families of England and France have a generational seat. The Rockefeller family in the US holds a seat.

The 13 Bloodlines of the Illuminati


Illuminati Hierarchy


Also let me add this:


Who Runs the World? - Want to Know?


Why is that we seem to choose to decide those that are in the forefront...or on stage so to speak, that they really hold the clout and power? ...or that that is a measure, benchmark or whatever of it?


What lurks in the shadows I guess, is only something the shadow knows, or for those who choose not to peek in to them, the best they can or are willing to alter their paradigm and what they think the know.

BTW, there is much more to consider on the NWO/Illuminati and Mind Control Deck for those who both are either interesting and/or have missed some of archive repository we have here, on these topics....

[Alpha]

The reason I think this is a non-issue is that with any transition in power there are this time between the start of the transition until the reigns are handed over.

Do we really know VO, Who holds the power/"reigns" and what if any "transition" there is?

Who gave the folks on the public stage "the power" and do they really have it/any?...or perhaps do they march to a different drummer that we don't know about, choose not to look at or understand...if that is even possible.

Or do they make us believe that they do?

Just putting this out there.....yeah, and I know it's not a popular view for some around here.....