Project Camelot interviews Dan Burisch

[blackeyes]

Dr. Dan Burisch tells all or almost all. Once you start into part 1 you will want more. What an amazing story. And I believe him.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhK3Os_eE4g

[DarkoMarco]

I have never known what to say about Bursch, the main problem with me is that I've been unable to pull corrolative threads from the story and hold them up to the light in comparison to other threads of it's kind. Mostly because there are no other threads of it's kind that I have run across.
For me, when fumbling in the rabbit hole and feeling around in the dark like you have to do when judging conspiracy storeis; there are two main methods for obtaining data to add to your conspiracy Lego Castle.
1. Contrast/Compare or Corrolation.
I love the Wendelle Stevens contact stories, because you can compare and contrast the first hand testimonial of people and reported visitor dialogue. And since there are so many you can really learn a lot this way.

2. SFSPBST (Sure Fire Shock Proof Bullshit Detector)
I don't know if this is a devoloped discerning ability or your born with it, but I trust mine, it is probably my greatest gift and my greatest curse.
It is the ability to see, detect congruency or lack there of in people's communications.
People use a combination of word content, facial expresion, body language and voice tone when communicating.
When body language, tone, word content, expresion match, it is called congruency or congruent and chances are the person is telling the truth.
If they don't match, and your detecting it, even on a level that you are unable to describe right away, the person is probably not telling the truth. It is being incongruent.

1. Burisch's story is not very easy to use corrollation with, there really are no other stories like it. For me, that is a strike against it.

2. Burisch is insistanty Sad and cry babyish through out the presentations I've seen. Something about people running on one emotion strikes dischord with me.
He seems like an attention premadonna, and those types of folks are willing to run there mouth and tell stories for the sake of attention and attention alone.
There is a lot of incongruency I see when watching his interviews and bottom line, I just don't believe him.

Though I personally have a hard time with his story, the folks at project camelot sure do believe him. David Wilcock seems to believe him. Henry Deacon seems to corroborate his stories.

[Electrocuted]

Project Camelot is goOd!