Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Morgan Stanley Pays Fine for Illegal Oil Derivative Trading

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,258

    Morgan Stanley Pays Fine for Illegal Oil Derivative Trading

    Morgan Stanley pays $14 million oil-trading Fine

    Miami Herald


    WASHINGTON -- In another black eye for Wall Street, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission late Thursday announced a $14 million fine against Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. to settle accusations of hiding its complex oil trades.

    The settlement, in which Morgan Stanley did not admit or deny the accusations, comes as oil prices have continued their steady upwards march and have some oil analysts again saying that excessive speculation is again pushing up energy prices. One recent estimate put the cost of that to consumers and businesses at $300 billion annually.

    In an announcement after U.S. markets had closed, the CFTC said that a trader from Morgan Stanley conspired on Feb. 6, 2009, with a counterpart from Swiss financial firm UBS Securities to hide from authorities a prohibited trading activity.



    As usual nobody will admit to anything but paying a few million in fines is a acceptable compromise in order to reap billions in the murky world of derivatives. Gotta wonder what's really going on behind the OTC derivative scene with this oil business unfolding in the gulf.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Corner of walk & don't walk
    Posts
    8,329
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Skies View Post
    As usual nobody will admit to anything but paying a few million in fines is a acceptable compromise in order to reap billions in the murky world of derivatives. Gotta wonder what's really going on behind the OTC derivative scene with this oil business unfolding in the gulf.
    I don't know about you, DS, but I would rather they admit than pay the fine.

    I think "fines" are the cost of doing business to many of them, recouped by more shuffling of the books.

    I would rather see conviction, jail time, and people loosing everything if they can't own up to their deeds. They are the worse kind of coward.
    [

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,258
    Quote Originally Posted by VOguy View Post
    I don't know about you, DS, but I would rather they admit than pay the fine.

    I think "fines" are the cost of doing business to many of them, recouped by more shuffling of the books.

    I would rather see conviction, jail time, and people loosing everything if they can't own up to their deeds. They are the worse kind of coward.
    Your right about fines being the cost of doing business... it's considered overhead. I'm positive GS will pay whatever fine that's imposed on them and it'll be business as usual until the next implosion and then they'll get bailed out and continue on. l

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •