Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 37

Thread: white smoke from Vatican

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,004

    white smoke from Vatican

    .. and the six o'clock bells toll at six o'clock as crowds cheer.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,004
    Is it just me, ... or did the decision take much less time than the past decisions have?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,199
    Must be a good Roy Tan...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Royal Oak, Michigan
    Posts
    1,265
    German Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger Named New Pope

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Royal Oak, Michigan
    Posts
    1,265
    Bells, White Smoke Signal Newly-Elected Pope

    POSTED: 5:56 am EDT April 19, 2005
    UPDATED: 12:47 pm EDT April 19, 2005

    There's a new leader of the 1.1 billion member Catholic church.

    Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of Germany is the new pope. He will be Pope Benedict XVI.

    Joseph Ratzinger


    Chiming bells and white smoke from a chimney atop the Sistine Chapel confirmed Tuesday that cardinals have picked a successor to John Paul II.


    At first, it wasn't clear if the the smoke coming from the chimney was white, signaling a new pope, or black for an inconclusive vote. But the joyous ringing of church bells sent pilgrims gathered in St. Peter's Square into a frenzy of cheers. They chanted "Viva il Papa!" or "Long live the pope!"

    "It's only been 24 hours, surprising how fast he was elected," Vatican Radio said, commenting on how the new pope was elected after just four or five ballots.

    Cardinals reached the decision in the first full day of the first conclave of the new millennium. Votes Monday and Tuesday morning failed to reach a consensus. The new pope is the church's 265th.

    Vatican Image
    Vatican bells ring to signal that a new pope has been chosen.



    Thousands of people have gathered at St. Peter's Square to see the pope publicly identified. The bells were still pealing 10 minutes after the original tolling.

    The cardinals were to hold two ballots in the morning and two in the afternoon of each day of voting. After the sessions, the ballots and any notes are burned.

    A winner needed the votes of two-thirds, or 77, of the 115 voting cardinals.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Dyersburg, Tennessee, United States
    Posts
    1,713
    We will be doing this again in 3 or 4 years the man is 78!........

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Dyersburg, Tennessee, United States
    Posts
    1,713
    And supposedly The NEXT Pope will be the last if Prophecy hold true by some of the people mentioned on C2C

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Washingtonville, NY, USA
    Posts
    485
    This election was fixed even before Pope John Paul II died, and there are those who say that Ratzinger acted as the de facto Pope during the last five years or so of Pope John Paul II's pontificate. Ratzinger is an unbelievably reactionary cardinal, and Pope Benedict XVI is going to experience immediate, wide-spread and violent reactions against his authority. As Reagan led to Dubya, so John Paul II leads to Benedict XVI --- and with the same consequences...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,004
    Quote Originally Posted by joequinn
    As Reagan led to Dubya, so John Paul II leads to Benedict XVI --- and with the same consequences...
    If this is true ... the Vatican interns need to watch their butts.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,004
    I was impressed with the acceptance speech.
    I'm happy to allow history to reveal the character of this new Pope through his actions in due time.

  11. #11
    Captain Beyond UnRegistered
    Well,they can't wait too long,gotta give the sheeple a new leader to worship,and keep the money machine rolling on,and tell all the sheeple what to think,less they begin to think for themselves!

    RiCk

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    910

    a little about the origin of the "conclave"

    In the 13th century, after a series of trying papal vacancies during which next to no church business could be conducted, it became clear that a reform was in order. In 1271, as a stalemate in the election process was nearing its fourth year, the flock took things into its own hands. The local officials in Viterbo—where, due to chronic instability in nearby Rome, the papal residence was then located—hastened the process. By order of the mayor, the doors to the Episcopal Palace, where the Sacred College of Cardinals was in session, were locked and boarded up. Guards were posted to prevent escape or entry. The town's secular officials then began to exert temporal pressure. The 15 feuding cardinals inside were told that if after three days they had not arrived at a decision, their meals would be restricted. If five further days elapsed without an election, only bread, wine, and water would be supplied. This nutritive window was to be further narrowed if a decision was not yet made. Even for the elect, fasting has its limits, but the proactive officials of Viterbo did not cease here. They clambered to the roof of the palace and tore off the majority of the tiles of the chapel in which the cardinals were deliberating. Exposed thus to indignity and the elements, the deadlock between the French and Italian contingents was finally broken and a new pope was elected.

    http://www.villagevoice.com/news/051...y,62901,6.html

    =======================

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Royal Oak, Michigan
    Posts
    1,265
    Quote Originally Posted by joequinn
    This election was fixed even before Pope John Paul II died, and there are those who say that Ratzinger acted as the de facto Pope during the last five years or so of Pope John Paul II's pontificate. Ratzinger is an unbelievably reactionary cardinal, and Pope Benedict XVI is going to experience immediate, wide-spread and violent reactions against his authority. As Reagan led to Dubya, so John Paul II leads to Benedict XVI --- and with the same consequences...
    I agree Joe, after all Ratzinger was the person closest to the Pope.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •