Soul Groups - Do they Exist?

[Alpha]

I adhere to the Michael Teachings definition of a soul group.
It's simple.
When your soul was created,,,casted out of the Tao,,,,it was casted out within a group of a thousand,,,give or take 200-300.
Think of a 1000 piece puzzle,,,,your one of the pieces.
The same teachings state that 2-5 sister groups get spun out of the void at the same time,,,different puzzles,,,but similar pictures.

Interactions with your sister groups isn't exactly the same as your own soul group,,but,,,highly encouraged and done, and is supposed to feel right to do so.
It is also stated,,,that interacting with members of your own soul group is rarer than you may think.
Apparently,,the connections are so strong,,,you tend to lay aside karmic responcibilites and lessons nessasary for undertaking when frolicking with members of your own soul group.
As such,,,such interactions are ussually reserved for inbetween life interactions.

That's very interesting DM.

There is a difference IMHO between "soul groups" and "soul mates" in the most conventional "definitions" of such.

Soul groups are allegedly souls that you travel with repeatedly within and without incarnations, in different roles to both help the spiritual growth of the soul, both as students and teachers. Often times, the roles and lessons, in a broad sense are agreed upon before the individual incarnation.

Soul Mates on the other hand...well this is easier...

Soul Mates and Twin Flames

I haven't read the Michael teachings in entirety yet, however it seems that they are using the term to describe something else...JMHO of course.

Many channelers claiming varied teachings/hypothesis. I'm sure there may be some truth within them all, and then again perhaps not ....there's Cayce, Jane Roberts, Esther Hicks, Neale Donald Walsh, Madame Blavatsky etc.....along with Yarbro.

Guess the question may be, why are they all getting different information?

[DarkoMarco]

That's very interesting DM.

There is a difference IMHO between "soul groups" and "soul mates" in the most conventional "definitions" of such.

Soul groups are allegedly souls that you travel with repeatedly within and without incarnations, in different roles to both help the spiritual growth of the soul, both as students and teachers. Often times, the roles and lessons, in a broad sense are agreed upon before the individual incarnation.

Soul Mates on the other hand...well this is easier...

Soul Mates and Twin Flames

I haven't read the Michael teachings in entirety yet, however it seems that they are using the term to describe something else...JMHO of course.

Many channelers claiming varied teachings/hypothesis. I'm sure there may be some truth within them all, and then again perhaps not ....there's Cayce, Jane Roberts, Esther Hicks, Neale Donald Walsh, Madame Blavatsky etc.....along with Yarbro.

Guess the question may be, why are they all getting different information?

Hey,,,,I feel you about channelling,,,,I know I might come across like a true believer with this Michael stuff,,,,but,,,,I have read book cases of spirit/occult related stuff in my time,,,,never,,,,,never have I ran across something that failed to set my BS meter off like the Michael Teachings,,,,so much usefull information and so easy to understand,,,,,so,,,,,,if I'm a tad bit pushy about it, I apoligise,,,,I enjoyed them so much and feel so lucky to have stumbled across them,,,,I just want others to have that chance.

But as far as some of the best channelers having discrepencies,,,I don't know. Cayce would have given us much better stuff if some one was there to ask the right questions. Hell,,,,Cayce got shut up a lot of times cause people couldn't handle the info. Jane Roberts IMHO doesn't disagree with the michael teachings at all,,,,,but I'll be honest,,,,,,,Jane Roberts Seth material is very high level stuff,,,,,,,,,,in some cases superior to the Michael teachings,,,but,,,,,,they intail significant IQ in the reader for proper absorption.
And Cayce and Blavatsky agreed like crazy.

But,,,,I gotta tell you,,,have you ever picked up Blavatsky's Isis unvielled? A huge two volume set, each volume close to a thousand pages. The same goes for The secret Doctrine,,I've read both of the two volume sets,,,,,,both extremely good. But,,,,with a lot less reading and I lot less pain,,,,I got way more out of the Michael Teachings.


Oh,,and one little bitty teensy thing,,,,Yarbro didn't channel Michael,,,,a group of folks that wished to keep thier annanimity did. Yarbro was thier chosen writer to compile there notes.

Jane Roberts Seth Material may be the absolute best material out there. It is absolutely the highest level stuff. I've read "the seth material" and,,,it is very difficult to read through and absorb. You have to digest small portions. Maybe a higher IQ could tackle it without the small doses thing.
A Sadhu IQ if you will,,,,I could get it,,,but with a bit of work involved on my part.
The Michael Teachings are far simpler,,,,,much much easier to grasp and apply IMHO.

On another note,,,,I pm'd Sadhu about two weeks ago,,,,I suggested he come back,,,I told him IW misses him,,and it was just a silly little spat. No sarcasm or nothing,,I swear I was genuine.

[Alpha]

DM, I just looked at the forum and I realized we really don't have a lot here either on channeling or those who channel.

I'm going to copy and paste your post above to a new thread....think we could use a general thread like that as well as perhaps separate threads on specific channelers for discussion. What do you think? Would you like to oversee that deck? PM me if you do so we can discuss.

Here's the new thread: Channelling - General Discussion

[Judee]

I only know that unconditional love is perfection

Absolutely Topper. It is also the ultimate state of being!

[DarkoMarco]

DM, I just looked at the forum and I realized we really don't have a lot here either on channeling or those who channel.

I'm going to copy and paste your post above to a new thread....think we could use a general thread like that as well as perhaps separate threads on specific channelers for discussion. What do you think? Would you like to oversee that deck? PM me if you do so we can discuss.

Here's the new thread: Channelling - General Discussion

Sounds awesome to me,,, I would love to.

[Alpha]

James Van Praagh was talking about Soul Groups tonight on Coast so I thought good time for a

[maryals]

I think we've discussed here, or perhaps at another thread, about how some of us here at IW feel we may be part of a Soul Group and here is where we learn, teach, interact even tho we are hundreds, thousands, of miles apart.
So of course that gets me to thinking about a social network like Facebook.
Some of the people I've "met" there are "Friends of Friends" and these "Friends of Friends" are people I've never met...at least not in this lifetime/timeframe
People whom you think would correspond often via FB, like family, all but ignore me....except for a small handful of cousins.
Yet those Strangers, these "Friends of Friends", have become close.
So, did what's his name inadvertently invent something to bring together members of "Soul Groups"? You know, "coincidence"?

Anyway, I do think there are such things as Soul Groups, Twin Flames, Soul Mates. And perhaps, as we find each other, it isn't so much coincidence as it may be some kind of "power"? Instinct? Something? That causes us to find each other.

Mary and Baby