Revelator
Caveatipse, what a relief to know our world will still be around for at least another thousand years!
Do the history books, in the year 3000, talk about "The Rapture" or mention things like, "The End Game of The End Times" as some sources talked about in 2006?
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." ~ Ronald Reagan
Revelator
Originally Posted by caveatipse
Excuse me please, but I always want to know when I use the wrong word. I don't mean to be critical, just trying to help. Hope you are not sensitive. In regard to "fulment", did you mean:
foment
One entry found for foment.
Main Entry: fo·ment
Pronunciation: 'fO-"ment, fO-'
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, to apply a warm substance to, from Late Latin fomentare, from Latin fomentum compress, from fovEre to heat, soothe; akin to Lithuanian degti to burn, Sanskrit dahati it burns
: to promote the growth or development of : ROUSE, INCITE <foment a rebellion>
synonym see INCITE
- fo·ment·er noun
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." ~ Ronald Reagan
Reformed romantic
The big question is, how do you address, alternate time lines? I could make a decision tomorrow that could effect the entire timeline, by just one choice! How do you come to us as this future, when your cannot know how we will react?
No disrespect, but I can change the entire future by my decisions right now! I can alter the future by what I say and do!
If I am wrong, please correct me!
CB
From here to Eternity
Excellent question CB....what about multi/paralell universe theory Matthew?
Does that exist?...if so, what parallel universe are you from and if not, why does that not exist or why is that not viable.
Please understand this is not a criticism, however a question of clarification and understanding
Do unto Others as you would have them do unto you
Elemental
These two men are born in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. They are only the forerunners. But they plant the seeds of the Government. We know their names are John P. and Richard H. Unfortunately, we do not know their full last names.
Elemental
I know nothing of those names.Caveatipse, what a relief to know our world will still be around for at least another thousand years!
Elemental
You are probably correct. In the year 3,000, and in the year that I was born and grew up, English as you know it will/did not exist, so it is as a foreign language to me.
Elemental
I shall answer this and the realted questions. Please give me a day or two to think about how to explain it. It is a difficult concept, but there is an answer.
Reformed romantic
Sure, no hurry my friend! Take your time, we been here for 2 years, so we can wait a few days if needed!
CB
From here to Eternity
Chief Big Beard
I assume you mean faster than light? Since traveliing at the speed of light would not do anything to alter your timespace as far as I understand it... it would alter it relative to people travelling at different speeds or accelerations, but would not greatly alter your place in time... Am I correct in this assumption?Time travel, at least the way we do it, involves traveling at the speed of light. Einstein was relatively correct, if you will excuse the pun.
Do you use a craft to travel at this speed?
proj·ect
1. something that is contemplated, devised, or planned; plan; scheme.
2. a large or major undertaking, especially one involving considerable money, personnel, and equipment.
3. a specific task of investigation, especially in scholarship.
4. to propose, contemplate, or plan.
5. to throw, cast, or impel forward or onward.
6. to set forth or calculate (some future thing).
7. to extend or protrude beyond something else.
8. to use one's voice forcefully enough to be heard at a distance, as in a theater.
9. to produce a clear impression of one's thoughts, personality, role, etc.
Elemental
Well, the closer a human being gets to light speed, the more time changes. You do not have to actually exceed light speed. In fact, we do not know if that is possible. Nothing yet measured travels faster than light. But when a human eing actually travels at light speed, his molecules swich from solid material form to their purer energy form. In that energy form, those molecules may be manipulated to slow or even prevent the aging process. But to answer your question, all relative speed differences produce minute changes in time for the traveler. But at actual light speed, that time change is the most dramatic. And, the thing is that we have discovered how to mimic light speed without actually moving. So we do not use personal craft, but rather very large "booths" or "stalls," into which the time traveler enters. I will try to explain in more detail later when I think of how best to do it. Thanks for the questions. Keep asking please. Matthew
Reformed romantic
One way to go faster than light is to make the light slower! Light in vacuum travels at a speed c which is a universal constant, but in a dense medium such as water or glass, light slows down to c/n where n is the refractive index of the medium (1.0003 for air, 1.4 for water). It is possible for particles to travel through air or water at faster than the speed of light in the medium.
Does this have any implications to time travel? Perhaps time travel in a liquid medium would make faster than light speed possible. Mebbe even make it easier?
From here to Eternity
Elemental
Our scientists actually found that this is only a relative illusion, that light actually is not traveling faster in a vacuum or liquid, but only appears that way, as I understand it. As I am a messemger and not a scientist, it ia difficult for me to elaborate more. When I do know, however, is that there is no need. At light speed, we travel through time, and so far it works pretty well.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks