The First Message

[Alpha]

A few more question for you Matthew...thanks

A)What if anything do you know about John Titor, his claims and legitimacy?

B) Where is your time and space located relative to ours or the way we perceive it?

[bagbear]

Matthew, it is interesting to hear from you but... it seems as though you are passing the moral responsibiities for effecting the changes you want onto others who cannot be sure of all the implications. Can you not act yourself? bb

[caveatipse]

My pleasure to answer all questions the best I can:

A)What if anything do you know about John Titor, his claims and legitimacy?

I know he caused quite a stir on here. I actually do not know him or much about him, except that he sounds like he could indeed be ligitimate.

B) Where is your time and space located relative to ours or the way we perceive it?

I am not sure Iunderstand the question. However, if I do, I guess the answer is that I am in the same time-space continuum as you. I am a human being who lives in linear time in the same universe. The only difference is that I have traveled in time. I hope that helps. Please tell me if I have misunderstood the question.

[caveatipse]

Matthew, it is interesting to hear from you but... it seems as though you are passing the moral responsibiities for effecting the changes you want onto others who cannot be sure of all the implications. Can you not act yourself? bb

This is an excellent question, and one that I expected. The answer is that I am designated as Messenger for the Resistance. I am not an Assasin or a Spy. All I am authorized to do is deliver the message. We do have Assasins and other agents who are also on the case. However, we are having trouble finding the two men (babies at this point), if they have even been born. We know only that they shall be born sometime in 2006. Our reasoning is that, with many more people who live in this time looking for them, there is a better chance of finding them. So yes, you are right. If we can find them, then we have the moral obligation to somehow change the outcome of their lives. But we have yet to find them.

Matthew

[Alpha]

My pleasure to answer all questions the best I can.

I am not sure I understand the question. However, if I do, I guess the answer is that I am in the same time-space continuum as you. I am a human being who lives in linear time in the same universe. The only difference is that I have traveled in time. I hope that helps. Please tell me if I have misunderstood the question.

Thanks Matthew.

I'm not a physicist nor a scientist therefore perhaps I misunderstand the space time continuum.

However that said, let me attempt to rephrase. Since the "time-space continuum" combines three-dimensional space and one-dimensional time into a single construct, how do you fragment that to travel?

Also where does your 3rd dimensional space lie relative to our 3rd dimensional space....integreated with it...on top of it...beside it? Is there a magnetic or frequency (vibrational) component to it.

I have more questions, dependent on your response.

[Captain Beyond]

Is the universe bigger or smaller than we know it to be now? Has the expansion continued, or has it slowed down to any measurable degree?

Also, what is the current best theory on the universe? What has replaced superstring theory?

What dramatic climatic changes have occurred in the near 1,000 years? Great earth changes etc.?

Thanks for your reply in advance!

[caveatipse]

Thanks Matthew.

I'm not a physicist nor a scientist therefore perhaps I misunderstand the space time continuum.

However that said, let me attempt to rephrase. Since the "time-space continuum" combines three-dimensional space and one-dimensional time into a single construct, how do you fragment that to travel?

Also where does your 3rd dimensional space lie relative to our 3rd dimensional space....integreated with it...on top of it...beside it? Is there a magnetic or frequency (vibrational) component to it.

I have more questions, dependent on your response.

Ok now I think I understand. Well, it is not so much that space is three dimensions and time one, but that time is the fourth dimension in the enetire system. It is a part of the system, integral with length, width, and height. Like a mathematical equation, time is one variable of several (there are seven total dimensions). Thus, to alter it affects the others, but the equation may still be balanced by manipulating it to affect the seventh dimension, which is emotion, rather than the first three. This is why time travel is so difficult on the traveler. But by altering emotion, we affect a variable that so far does not seem to matter except to the traveler. Thus, space is not affected. We are living in the same space as you, just at a different time.

[caveatipse]

My pleasure:

Is the universe bigger or smaller than we know it to be now? Has the expansion continued, or has it slowed down to any measurable degree?

In terms of physical space, it is infinite, and always has been, thus it is not bigger or smaller. The expansion of known matter, however, has continued. But 1,000 years is not really significant in terms of the large numbers that govern the universe, so there are no real noticeable changes.


Also, what is the current best theory on the universe? What has replaced superstring theory?

Current theory is remarkably similar to superstring. We know that indeed everything that we know as matter is simply energetic forces in relation to one another. There is not really any true matter. It is all energy, just in a different relative juxtaposition to itself.

What dramatic climatic changes have occurred in the near 1,000 years? Great earth changes etc.?

There have been a few major volcanoes, and periods of cold and then hot, but you would recognize the climate in the year 3,000 as basically the same as now, except ust a little bit hotter.
Matthew

[Alpha]

Ok now I think I understand. Well, it is not so much that space is three dimensions and time one, but that time is the fourth dimension in the enetire system. It is a part of the system, integral with length, width, and height. Like a mathematical equation, time is one variable of several (there are seven total dimensions). Thus, to alter it affects the others, but the equation may still be balanced by manipulating it to affect the seventh dimension, which is emotion, rather than the first three. This is why time travel is so difficult on the traveler. But by altering emotion, we affect a variable that so far does not seem to matter except to the traveler. Thus, space is not affected. We are living in the same space as you, just at a different time.

Thanks Matthew

So are you saying then that I higher level of consciousness, awareness...perhaps a meditative state allow one to perceive your "space" without any physicality of travel?

Some theorize today, that there perhaps are 11- 12 dimensions, not just 7.

How do you call / name these dimensions and how would or do you describe them in your time. Are you able to travel freely through and to them? If yes, how?

[caveatipse]

Thanks Matthew

So are you saying then that I higher level of consciousness, awareness...perhaps a meditative state allow one to perceive your "space" without any physicality of travel?

Some theorize today, that there perhaps are 11- 12 dimensions, not just 7.

How do you call / name these dimensions and how would or do you describe them in your time. Are you able to travel freely through and to them? If yes, how?

No, actually the space we live in is the same space you live in. There is merely a variable change -- that of time. So it is literally the same space. The seven dimensions that have been proved by the year 3,000 (though there are of course more theorized) are:

1. length
2. width
3. height
4. time
5. relative position
6. energy
7. emotion

[Captain Beyond]

I have a question and it is not necessarily time travel related, but since you say you come from the future, your common knowledge and level of understanding should enlighten us perhaps.

Our science today suggests an approximate age of 13 to 14 billion years,and as I mentioned earlier,we can observe the galaxies getting farther and farther apart for as far as we can see.

My questions then is this, if the "Big Bang" is correct and we can see the near beginnings of the creation of the universe,shouldn't we see something quite different than this huge expanding universe? Should we not see a very small universe since we are essentially looking back in time? Does this not contradict the big bang theory? If so, what is the correct or current best theory?

[caveatipse]

I have a question and it is not necessarily time travel related, but since you say you come from the future, your common knowledge and level of understanding should enlighten us perhaps.

Our science today suggests an approximate age of 13 to 14 billion years,and as I mentioned earlier,we can observe the galaxies getting farther and farther apart for as far as we can see.

My questions then is this, if the "Big Bang" is correct and we can see the near beginnings of the creation of the universe,shouldn't we see something quite different than this huge expanding universe? Should we not see a very small universe since we are essentially looking back in time? Does this not contradict the big bang theory? If so, what is the correct or current best theory?

You flatter me, but remember that I am not a scientist, only a Messenger. But I will try to answer based on the knowledge of the future.
You seem to be right, that, if we are looking back in time, we should see a smaller universe. This is why several scientists have proposed a contracting universe, or one that expands and contracts again and again. In terms of the ultimate origin, no one knows still, and may never. How could anyone know for sure exactly what happened billions of years ago? The Big Bang is still a viable theory, but our scientists have also come to propose the eternity of matter, i.e. that there was no creation at all, but that what we know as matter and the universe (which is actually only energy) has simply always existed, without beginning or end. This does not make sense to our minds, but that does not mean it is not possible.

[Alpha]

No, actually the space we live in is the same space you live in. There is merely a variable change -- that of time. So it is literally the same space. The seven dimensions that have been proved by the year 3,000 (though there are of course more theorized) are:

1. length
2. width
3. height
4. time
5. relative position
6. energy
7. emotion

I was referring to dimensions from a more esoteric point of view.

What I was referring to in addition to what you write is:

8. astral plane with subdimensions or planes
9. mental plane
10. causal plane
11. The source dimension of all of the above